Comparison of quantitative muscle ultrasound and whole-body muscle MRI in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 1 patients

Abstract

Introduction Muscle ultrasound is a fast, non-invasive and cost-effective examination that can identify structural muscular changes by assessing muscle thickness and echointensity (EI) with a quantitative analysis (QMUS). To assess applicability and repeatability of QMUS, we evaluated patients with genetically confirmed facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 1 (FSHD1), comparing their muscle ultrasound characteristics with healthy controls and with those detected by MRI. We also evaluated relationships between QMUS and demographic and clinical characteristics. Materials and methods Thirteen patients were included in the study. Clinical assessment included MRC sum score, FSHD score and The Comprehensive Clinical Evaluation Form (CCEF). QMUS was performed with a linear transducer scanning bilaterally pectoralis major, deltoid, rectus femoris, tibialis anterior and semimembranosus muscles in patients and healthy subjects. For each muscle, we acquired three images, which were analysed calculating muscle EI by computer-assisted grey-scale analysis. QMUS analysis was compared with semiquantitative 1.5 T muscle MRI scale. Results All muscles in FSHD patients showed a significant increased echogenicity compared to the homologous muscles in healthy subjects. Older subjects and patients with higher FSHD score presented increased muscle EI. Tibialis anterior MRC showed a significant inverse correlation with EI. Higher median EI was found in muscles with more severe MRI fat replacement. Conclusions QMUS allows quantitative evaluation of muscle echogenicity, displaying a tight correlation with muscular alterations, clinical and MRI data. Although a confirmation on larger sample is needed, our research suggests a possible future application of QMUS in diagnosis and management of muscular disorders.

Skeletal muscle as a pro- and anti-inflammatory tissue: insights from children to adults and ultrasound findings

“…The grayscale analysis, as a crucial element of ultrasonographic research, was specially created to investigate muscle echogenicity [47]. This technique includes the use of quantitative methods to determine the echogenicity (echogenicity is a feature that indicates how dehydrated and degenerated the muscle is, mostly caused by the fibrous tissues and the amount of fat deposit in the muscle), associated with the concentration of fibrous tissues and the amount of fat deposit in the muscle [48]. Such modifications demonstrate chronic inflammation; the latter is associated with echogenicity increasing, which is a sign of leaving normal muscle tissue behind [49].…”

Immune-Mediated Necrotizing Myopathy (IMNM): A Story of Antibodies

“…First, clinical score of muscle strength such as MMT-8 (Manual Muscle Testing) [42]. Additionally, muscle MRI follow-up can be useful to monitor disease activity with a focus on edema, muscle atrophy or fat replacement [43]. Another monitoring tool is muscle enzyme blood levels such as CK, aldolase and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH).…”