1938
DOI: 10.1086/physzool.11.1.30151441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Quantitative Precipitin Techniques as Influenced by Injection Procedures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1939
1939
1966
1966

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Magnus (1908) noted that antisera specificity was lessened by continued injections of an antigen. Wolfe (1935Wolfe ( , 1936 and Wolfe and Baier (1938) emphasized the importance of the effects of injection methods on the specificity and aspecificity of the serum precipitin tests. It was shown that the type of response is greatly influenced by the method of injection, the specificity being enhanced by limiting the amount of protein injected.…”
Section: R Wolfementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnus (1908) noted that antisera specificity was lessened by continued injections of an antigen. Wolfe (1935Wolfe ( , 1936 and Wolfe and Baier (1938) emphasized the importance of the effects of injection methods on the specificity and aspecificity of the serum precipitin tests. It was shown that the type of response is greatly influenced by the method of injection, the specificity being enhanced by limiting the amount of protein injected.…”
Section: R Wolfementioning
confidence: 99%