2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00701-019-03824-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of radiological and clinical outcomes after surgical reduction with fixation or halo-vest immobilization for treating unstable atlas fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a follow-up study of 22 patients with atlas burst fractures by Dvorak et al [ 15 ] showed that patients that underwent conservative treatments failed to regain functional preoperative levels, and hinted that nonsurgical treatments were not optimal management options. The strongest Halo-vest has only 75% restriction on cervical flexion and extension activity, so that, preservative treatment with a Halo-vest has a high risk of nonunion [ 5 ]. Immobilization of the cervical spine for several months may result in significant discomfort and other complications especially in elderly patients [ 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, a follow-up study of 22 patients with atlas burst fractures by Dvorak et al [ 15 ] showed that patients that underwent conservative treatments failed to regain functional preoperative levels, and hinted that nonsurgical treatments were not optimal management options. The strongest Halo-vest has only 75% restriction on cervical flexion and extension activity, so that, preservative treatment with a Halo-vest has a high risk of nonunion [ 5 ]. Immobilization of the cervical spine for several months may result in significant discomfort and other complications especially in elderly patients [ 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The treatment of unstable atlas fractures is still controversial. Nonsurgical treatments of unstable atlas fractures have the disadvantages of deficient reduction and high rates of nonunion, and even neurological damage [ 5 ]. Although surgical treatments with C1–C2 or C0–C2 fusion can achieve satisfactory stability and bone fusion in unstable atlas fractures, the normal C1–C2 motion is lost [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a follow-up study of 22 patients with atlas burst fractures by Dvorak et al [15] showed that patients that underwent conservative treatments failed to regain functional preoperative levels, and hinted that nonsurgical treatments were not optimal management options. The strongest Halo-vest has only 75% restriction on cervical flexion and extension activity, so that, preservative treatment with a Halovest has a high risk of nonunion [5]. Immobilization of the cervical spine for several months may result in significant discomfort and other complications especially in elderly patients [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dysphagia scale was evaluated as follows: "normal" refers to patients without any swallowing di culties; "mild" refers to patients with rare, intermittent episodes of dysphagia; "moderate" refers to patients with some di culty when swallowing some special food; and "severe" refers to patients with di culty even swallowing liquid [16]. The neck pain visual analogue scale (VAS) and neck disability index (NDI) [4] were assessed, and scores were recorded by an independent examiner.…”
Section: Evaluation Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is still much controversy about the treatment of C1 fractures [2]. The most common fracture classi cation is the Gehweiler classi cation: type I fractures are isolated fractures of the anterior ring of the atlas, type II refers to isolated fractures of the posterior arch of the atlas, type III are combined fractures of the anterior and posterior arches of the atlas, type IV refers to isolated fractures of the lateral mass, and type V refers to fractures of the transverse process [3][4]. Types III and IV are considered unstable fractures and often require surgery [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%