2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of real-time polymerase chain reaction and DNA-strip technology in microbiological evaluation of periodontitis treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
66
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
66
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The clinical detection threshold of the current device was estimated to be approximately 10 4 copies/two paper points, based on our preliminary experiments and the results from this clinical application. This threshold is comparable with those reported for a DNA probe method (Komiya et al, 2000), an antibody-based detection test (Nakagawa et al, 1995;Boyer et al, 1996) and a DNA-strip technology-based method (Eick et al, 2011), and is also considered to be clinically relevant because such a threshold potentially matches the range in which nonsurgical or surgical therapy is unsuccessful and antimicrobial treatment is needed (Preshaw, 2004;Kaman et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The clinical detection threshold of the current device was estimated to be approximately 10 4 copies/two paper points, based on our preliminary experiments and the results from this clinical application. This threshold is comparable with those reported for a DNA probe method (Komiya et al, 2000), an antibody-based detection test (Nakagawa et al, 1995;Boyer et al, 1996) and a DNA-strip technology-based method (Eick et al, 2011), and is also considered to be clinically relevant because such a threshold potentially matches the range in which nonsurgical or surgical therapy is unsuccessful and antimicrobial treatment is needed (Preshaw, 2004;Kaman et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Microbiological assessment of periodontal bacteria is important in selecting appropriate antimicrobial therapy, in deciding the need for periodontal surgery, and in evaluating the treatment outcome (Teles et al, 2006;Xiang et al, 2010). For clinicians in private practice settings, bacterial detection services such as those using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) method and test system using DNA-strip technology (Eick et al, 2011) are commercially available. They are, however, costly and not considered to be point-of-care testing per se.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of techniques have been used for examining the microbial composition in periodontal clinical samples (Eick et al, 2011; Rocas et al, 2015; Zambon & Haraszthy, 1995). These assessments have been invaluable to dental basic science and translational research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Eleven bacteria previously considered associated with periodontal disease (Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tanerella forsythia, Treponema denticola, Prevotella intermedia, Parvimonas micra, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Campylobacter rectus, Eubacterium nodatum, Eikenella corrodens, and Capnocytophaga spec.) were tested using this probe from individual pooled samples of subgingival plaque obtained from the deepest pocket in each sextant.…”
Section: Microbiological Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%