2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.07.149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of rectilinear biphasic waveform energy versus truncated exponential biphasic waveform energy for transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies differ in the energy delivery protocols, electrode configurations, and waveform characteristics but uniformly have found that biphasic shocks are more effective than monophasic. This advantage is present whatever the precise waveform; indeed two recent studies have directly compared biphasic shock waveforms and found no difference in efficacy 72,73 . Biphasic shocks have a higher success rate than monophasic, with lower energy, lower current, and less skin and muscle damage.…”
Section: Improving Immediate Cardioversion Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies differ in the energy delivery protocols, electrode configurations, and waveform characteristics but uniformly have found that biphasic shocks are more effective than monophasic. This advantage is present whatever the precise waveform; indeed two recent studies have directly compared biphasic shock waveforms and found no difference in efficacy 72,73 . Biphasic shocks have a higher success rate than monophasic, with lower energy, lower current, and less skin and muscle damage.…”
Section: Improving Immediate Cardioversion Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In RBW, shown in Fig. 6,28 But, all studies agree that both the peak and mean currents of the RBW are less than other monophasic and biphasic waveforms. 22 Some studies have shown that RBW is more e±cient in comparison with other waveforms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Until further evidence becomes available, this information can be used to extrapolate biphasic cardioversion doses to other tachyarrhythmias. [135][136][137][138] A recent prospective randomized study that compared the rectilinear biphasic waveform (200 J maximum selected energy) with a biphasic truncated exponential waveform (360 J maximum energy) for elective cardioversion found no significant differences in efficacy between the 2 waveforms. 134 …”
Section: Supraventricular Tachycardias (Reentry Svt)mentioning
confidence: 99%