2007
DOI: 10.1097/maj.0b013e3180986276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Red Cell and Whole Blood Volume as Performed Using Both Chromium-51–Tagged Red Cells and Iodine-125–Tagged Albumin and Using I-131–Tagged Albumin and Extrapolated Red Cell Volume

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Volumes were calculated from the known dosage administered and the radioactivity concentration measured in the blood. An extensive description of these methods is described elsewhere [32]. {Owing to temporary federal withdrawal of 125 I, PV was directly measured in 18 study participants using the BVA-100 semi-automated system (Daxor) designed for measuring plasma 131 I-labelled human serum albumin.…”
Section: Blood Volume Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Volumes were calculated from the known dosage administered and the radioactivity concentration measured in the blood. An extensive description of these methods is described elsewhere [32]. {Owing to temporary federal withdrawal of 125 I, PV was directly measured in 18 study participants using the BVA-100 semi-automated system (Daxor) designed for measuring plasma 131 I-labelled human serum albumin.…”
Section: Blood Volume Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…46,49 This technique has been validated against the technically difficult and time-intensive double-labeled technique of chromium-tagged red blood cells and plasma albumin 1 to 125 (considered the gold standard) with the comparator volumes being within 1% of one another. 50,51 Normal total BV by this technique is defined as measured volumes within ±8% of the expected normal volume for each individual patient and RBCM and PV as measured volumes within ±10% of expected normal volumes. This reflects ≈3 SDs from the expected normal value and assures that measured values lying beyond these parameters are not in a normal range for …”
Section: Assessment Of Congestion and Extracellular Fluid Volume Overmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To settle this question, Dworkin et al directly compared blood volume analysis results from double labeling with those from the BVA-100 (22). No significant difference was found between the semiautomated results and those from the gold standard test, and the authors concluded that the 2 studies were equivalent.…”
Section: Automation Comes To Blood Volume Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%