2009
DOI: 10.1016/s1003-9953(08)60073-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of reduction behavior of Fe2O3, ZnO and ZnFe2O4 by TPR technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
60
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
7
60
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1). The broad reduction peak located at about 665°C is related to the reduction of ZnO to metallic zinc [50], while the roughness of reduction plots observed above 800°C is probably a result partial sublimation of metallic zinc [51]. The reduction profiles of the samples containing both copper and iron are much more complex (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…1). The broad reduction peak located at about 665°C is related to the reduction of ZnO to metallic zinc [50], while the roughness of reduction plots observed above 800°C is probably a result partial sublimation of metallic zinc [51]. The reduction profiles of the samples containing both copper and iron are much more complex (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It can be pointed out that addition of Fe slightly shifts the reduction of Ni oxide interacting with Al 2 O 3 to lower temperatures. In this case, also the presence of Fe oxide (and the formation of more oxygen vacancies) improves the reduction of NiO [38].…”
Section: Reducibility: H 2 -Tprmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sample 2 shows at temperature 555 o C the reduction process for Fe 3 O 4 to FeO has been occurred. There has been mentioned that amount of zinc will decrease the hydrogen consumption for reduction process [8]. This can be seen from Figure 5 that zinc contain for sample 1 is higher than sample 2.…”
Section: Oxide Reductionmentioning
confidence: 63%