2004
DOI: 10.1007/bf02772676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of reference genes for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis of gene expression in sugarcane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
190
4
10

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 265 publications
(216 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
12
190
4
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The high abundance of mRNA requires higher dilutions of cDNA to allow direct comparison with the target gene amplification. These stock dilutions require more work and introduce more error, leading to greater inaccuracy in RT-qPCR analyses (Iskandar et al, 2004). Consequently, it is advantageous to have a reference gene that is expressed at levels similar to those of the genes of interest, and to choose treatments that have little effect on the reference gene (Suzuki et al, 2000).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high abundance of mRNA requires higher dilutions of cDNA to allow direct comparison with the target gene amplification. These stock dilutions require more work and introduce more error, leading to greater inaccuracy in RT-qPCR analyses (Iskandar et al, 2004). Consequently, it is advantageous to have a reference gene that is expressed at levels similar to those of the genes of interest, and to choose treatments that have little effect on the reference gene (Suzuki et al, 2000).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transcriptomic data-based method has the advantage of identifying novel candidate reference genes that are more stable than the conventional ones. Validation of reference genes for qPCR has been reported in many plant species; for example, GAPDH in sugarcane and chickpea [15,28]; EF1a in potato, Arabidopsis, and rice [22,23,25,29]; RPL2, PP2Acs, ACT and UBI in tomato [21]; and SKIP16, UKN1 and UKN2 in soybean [9] (Table 1). In rice, UBQ5 and EF1a were found to be the most stable across 25 rice samples which were derived from different tissues at various developmental stages [22,25].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these studies have been done with plants, such as wheat (Paolacci et al, 2009), barley (Burton et al, 2004), rice (Kim et al, 2003;Ding et al, 2004;Jain et al, 2006), potato (Nicot et al, 2005), soybean (Jian et al, 2008), grape (Reid et al, 2006), poplar (Brunner et al, 2004), tomato (Coker and Davies, 2003;Expósito-Rodríguez et al, 2008), coffee (BarsalobresCavallari et al, 2009), Arabidopsis thaliana (Czechowski et al, 2005;Remans et al, 2008), sugarcane (Iskandar et al, 2004), Eremosparton songoricum (Li et al, 2012), Lolium perenne (Lee et al, 2010), lettuce (Borowski et al, 2014), strawberry (Galli et al, 2015), and Salicornia europaea (Xiao et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%