2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-016-2723-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of regression-based and combined versions of Inverse Distance Weighted methods for spatial interpolation of daily mean temperature data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, the methods for obtaining meteorological data for a region based on the spatial interpolation of discrete meteorological stations mainly include the inverse distance weighting (IDW) [ 64 ], Kriging [ 49 ], Parameter-Elevation Regressions on Independent Slopes Model (PRISM), trend surface analysis (TSA), and thin plate smoothing spline (TPS) [ 65 ] methods. Among them, Kriging and IDW are the most widely used in practical applications.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the methods for obtaining meteorological data for a region based on the spatial interpolation of discrete meteorological stations mainly include the inverse distance weighting (IDW) [ 64 ], Kriging [ 49 ], Parameter-Elevation Regressions on Independent Slopes Model (PRISM), trend surface analysis (TSA), and thin plate smoothing spline (TPS) [ 65 ] methods. Among them, Kriging and IDW are the most widely used in practical applications.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precipitation data in this study were spatially interpolated by the GIDS, which has been proven to be more realistic than the common kriging interpolation and inverse distance weighted interpolation because it can take terrain, latitude and longitude into account through multiple regression analysis (Nalder and Wei, 1998). The formula is as follows (Kayıkc and Kazancı, 2016): Pgoodbreak=[]i=1NPi+λpgoodbreak−λi×Cx+φpgoodbreak−φi×CY+hpgoodbreak−hi×Cedi2/[]i=1N1di2, wherein P is expected to be interpolated precipitation in mm at point p with longitude λ p , latitude φ p and altitude h p ; P i is the observed mean precipitation at station i at longitude λ i , latitude φ i and altitude h i ; d i is the distance from the interpolation point p to measurement station i , N is the number of total measured stations; and C x , C y and C e is regression coefficients for X , Y and elevation, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precipitation data in this study were spatially interpolated by the GIDS, which has been proven to be more realistic than the common kriging interpolation and inverse distance weighted interpolation because it can take terrain, latitude and longitude into account through multiple regression analysis (Nalder and Wei, 1998). The formula is as follows (Kayıkc and Kazancı, 2016):…”
Section: Gradient Inverse Distance Squaredmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where T p is the estimated temperature at interpolation points; E d is digital elevation. Numbers of researches (Pan et al, 2004;Kayıkçı and Kazancı, 2016;Ma et al, 2020) were shown that a combination of temperature lapse rate and IDW technique for considering the elevation effects are needed for high-resolution daily temperature estimation.…”
Section: Freezing and Thawing Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study was used combined IDW and temperature lapse rate method (Kayıkçı and Kazancı, 2016) to evaluate the influence of elevation on the temperature and calculation of FI and TI. The spatial analysis showed that FI and TI were strongly correlated with altitude.…”
Section: Application and Uncertainty Of Freezing And Thawing Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%