Comparison of relative mRNA quantification models and the impact of RNA integrity in quantitative real-time RT-PCR

Abstract

Relative quantification in quantitative real-time RT-PCR is increasingly used to quantify gene expression changes. In general, two different relative mRNA quantification models exist: the delta-delta Ct and the efficiency-corrected Ct model. Both models have their advantages and disadvantages in terms of simplification on the one hand and efficiency correction on the other. The particular problem of RNA integrity and its effect on relative quantification in qRT-PCR performance was tested in different bovine tissues and cell lines (n = 11). Therefore different artificial and standardized RNA degradation levels were used. Currently fully automated capillary electrophoresis systems have become the new standard in RNA quality assessment. RNA quality was rated according the RNA integrity number (RIN). Furthermore, the effect of different length of amplified products and RNA integrity on expression analyses was investigated. We found significant impact of RNA integrity on relative expression results, mainly on cycle threshold (Ct) values and a minor effect on PCR efficiency. To minimize the interference of RNA integrity on relative quantification models, we can recommend to normalize gene expression by an internal reference gene and to perform an efficiency correction. Results demonstrate that innovative new quantification methods and normalization models can improve future mRNA quantification.

Lactobacillus paracasei and Lactobacillus plantarum strains downregulate proinflammatory genes in an ex vivo system of cultured human colonic mucosa

“…Total RNA quantity and integrity were evaluated using RNA 6000 Nano Chip in a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies). Total RNA was judged to be acceptable if the ribosomal fragments were present in a 28S/18S ratio over 1.5 and RNA integrity number (RIN) to be over 6 (Fleige et al 2006). RNA samples were stored at -80°C until use for microarray hybridizations and qPCR analysis.…”

Effective in vivo induction of NKG2D ligands in acute myeloid leukaemias by all-trans-retinoic acid or sodium valproate

“…After subtracting the threshold cycle (C T ) value for GUS from the C T values of the target genes, the DC T values were converted with the formula 2 ÀDDCT to show the foldrelative increase in MIC-A, ULBP2 and ULBP3 mRNA expression compared with the levels before treatment, which were given the arbitrary value of 1. 20 …”

MLL/AF-4 leukemic cells recruit new blood vessels but do not incorporate into capillaries in culture or in a NOD/SCID xenograft model

“…The amount of target relative to reference sample was calculated as 2 ÀDDCt , as described earlier. 6 As shown in Table 1, we found that t(4;11) leukemia cells expressed mRNA for EPOR at high levels, but expressed that for vWF, Tie-2 and KDR at low levels or beyond detection. MV4-11 expressed EPOR and VE-cadherin at higher levels, whereas RS4;11 expressed CD34 and SEM-K2 vWF at higher levels.…”