1992
DOI: 10.1097/00002826-199202001-00529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Residual Effects and Efficacy of Zolpidem, Flurazepam and Placebo in Patients With Chronic Insomnia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1996
1996
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, objective and subjective measures of sleepiness revealed no difference between zolpidem and placebo. Similar results have been reported by Scharf et al (1992) in 14 1 insomniac patients double-blind treated during two consecutive nights with zolpidem 10 or 20 mg, flurazepam 30 mg or placebo: flurazepam induced more daytime sedative effects than zolpidem or placebo.…”
Section: Studies With Placebo and Benzodiazepine Controlsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the contrary, objective and subjective measures of sleepiness revealed no difference between zolpidem and placebo. Similar results have been reported by Scharf et al (1992) in 14 1 insomniac patients double-blind treated during two consecutive nights with zolpidem 10 or 20 mg, flurazepam 30 mg or placebo: flurazepam induced more daytime sedative effects than zolpidem or placebo.…”
Section: Studies With Placebo and Benzodiazepine Controlsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The impact of zolpidem on subsitution or copying tests has also been compared to flurazepam, triazolam and diazepam (Morselli et al, 1988;Bensimon et al, 1990;Nicholson and Pascoe 1986;Scharf et al, 1992). Only flurazepam was found to have a significant effect on performance in DSST.…”
Section: Vigilance and Attentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparative ef®cacy, safety, residual effects and performance of zolpidem have been established for: bretazenil (Gieschke et al, 1994), diazepam (Maillard et al, 1992, doxylamine Schadeck et al, 1996), unitrazepam (Emeriau et al, 1988;Maggioni and Frattola, 1988;Guieu et al, 1991;Vermeeren et al, 1991;Guazzelli et al, 1993;Murciano et al, 1993;Genton et al, 1994), urazepam (Cirignotta et al, 1988Scharf et al, 1992;Fleming et al, 1995;Mendelson et al, 1995a), lorazepam (Lebrault et al, 1989) lormetazepam (Lund et al, 1988Cluydts et al, 1995), midazolam (Praplan Pahud et al, 1990) nitrazepam (Uchiumi et al, 1994), oxazepam (Coupez et al, 1988), RO 41±3696 (Dingemanse et al, 1995), temazepam (Ochs et al, 1992;Gremion et al, 1992;Gengo et al, 1995;Rush and Grif®ths, 1996), trazodone , triazolam (Louvel et al, 1988;Nagakome et al, 1991;Takasawa et al, 1991;Balkin et al, 1992;Ochs et al, 1992;Ferrillo et al, 1992;Berlin et al, 1993;Kanno et al, 1993;Pagot et al, 1993;Roger et al, 1993;Steens et al, 1993;Monti et al, 1994;Uchiumi et al, 1994;Greenblatt et al, 1996;Rush and Gif®...…”
Section: Comparative Studies Versus Other Sedatives and Hypnoticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various kinds of subjects were included in these studies: young adults, the elderly, healthy volunteers, and insomniac patients; there were also different durations of treatment, ranked between one single dose and 15 daily doses, being tested. Scharf et al (1992) used the Digit±Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) to compare residual effects of zolpidem and BZD.…”
Section: Impact On Memory and Performancementioning
confidence: 99%