2013
DOI: 10.3744/jnaoe.2013.5.1.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of residual strength-grounding damage index diagrams for tankers produced by the ALPS/HULL ISFEM and design formula method

Abstract: This study compares the Residual ultimate longitudinal strength -grounding Damage index (R-D) diagrams produced by two analysis methods: the ALPS/HULL Intelligent Supersize Finite Element Method (ISFEM) and the design formula (modified Paik and Mansour) method -used to assess the safety of damaged ships. The comparison includes four types of double-hull oil tankers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies have also been presented performing finite element analyses to estimate the residual structural capacity of the ship hull girders by Ehlers et al (2013); Kim et al (2013); Yamada (2014); Tekgoz et al (2015cTekgoz et al ( , 2015aTekgoz et al ( , 2015b; Parunov et al (2018); Tekgoz et al (2018b), and Corak and Parunov (2019).…”
Section: Damaged Ship Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have also been presented performing finite element analyses to estimate the residual structural capacity of the ship hull girders by Ehlers et al (2013); Kim et al (2013); Yamada (2014); Tekgoz et al (2015cTekgoz et al ( , 2015aTekgoz et al ( , 2015b; Parunov et al (2018); Tekgoz et al (2018b), and Corak and Parunov (2019).…”
Section: Damaged Ship Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach, looking soundly from an engineering point of view, is adopted also in the present study. The approach is further explored in Kim et al (2013), using the concept of the grounding damage index (GDI). The assumed general damage scenario for grounding caused by conically shaped rock is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Groundingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More details of the definition of the geometry of the rocking angle may be found in Paik et al (2012), Kim et al (2013) and Bužančić Primorac and Parunov (2015). An efficient method for predicting extent of the bottom damage is presented by Heinvee and Tabri (2015) and subsequently employed for structural reliability assessment of grounded ship by Ćorak et al (2017).…”
Section: Groundingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study the assessment of the sagging ultimate longitudinal strength of Aframax oil tanker (Table 1), damaged in a hypothetical grounding accident is calculated using an innovative Paik et al method [17], assuming that grounding is caused by conically shaped rock. Reduction of the ultimate strength is calculated by regression equations developed by Kim et al [18] using concept of grounding damage index (GDI). The GDI takes into account the extent and the location of grounding damage for both, inner and outer bottom structures.…”
Section: Hull-girder Residual Ultimate Longitudinal Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%