1986
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.160.3.3737921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of respiratory triggering and gating techniques for the removal of respiratory artifacts in MR imaging.

Abstract: Respiratory movement degrades magnetic resonance (MR) images of the chest and abdomen by increasing noise through the production of "ghost" artifacts and by decreasing edge sharpness in moving structures. Respiratory gating, which limits data acquisition to end-expiration, is successful in restoring edge sharpness and reducing ghosts but increases imaging time two to three times, which limits its use to sequences with short repetition times (TRs). To overcome this limitation, an alternative technique, respirat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SSFSE is remarkably motion insensitive, and, for this reason, the inability to breath-hold is not a contraindication for MRI to evaluate for appendicitis. We recommend that breath-holding be performed at end-tidal volume using the instructions, “breathe in, breathe out, stop breathing.” Imaging at end-inspiration is also effective, but the position of the diaphragm is less reproducible and can lead to misregistration of slices or sequences acquired in different breath-holds [29, 30]. …”
Section: Protocol Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SSFSE is remarkably motion insensitive, and, for this reason, the inability to breath-hold is not a contraindication for MRI to evaluate for appendicitis. We recommend that breath-holding be performed at end-tidal volume using the instructions, “breathe in, breathe out, stop breathing.” Imaging at end-inspiration is also effective, but the position of the diaphragm is less reproducible and can lead to misregistration of slices or sequences acquired in different breath-holds [29, 30]. …”
Section: Protocol Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respiratory triggering, however, initiates the acquisition of an MRI section at a fixed point of the respiratory cycle, restoring sharpness and reducing ghost artifacts. Unlike gating, triggering can be used to produce an image at any phase of the respiratory cycle, but it requires the use of longer TR [15]. An elaborate technique used to suppress respiratory motion uses respiratory gating with MRI navigators [16, 17].…”
Section: Technical Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Triggering of MR imaging sequences of the heart is often less demanding since artifacts between triggering pulses are acceptable. Respiration compensation (17,18) on the other hand requires a signal that is correlated with the position of the diaphragm and that shows no delay or drift. While a delay of less than 1 s can generally be accepted, a drift of the signal is less tolerable.…”
Section: Acquisition Of Physiological Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%