2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2005.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of results of ATP bioluminescence and traditional hygiene swabbing methods for the determination of surface cleanliness at a hospital kitchen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
96
1
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
6
96
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The biochemical ATP method provides information on the biological contamination on surface. The ATP method has been used to determine the cleanability of surfaces from organic soils in the food industry and in public and hospital buildings (Poulis et al 1993, Larson et al 2003, Aycicek et al 2006, Redsven et al 2007.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biochemical ATP method provides information on the biological contamination on surface. The ATP method has been used to determine the cleanability of surfaces from organic soils in the food industry and in public and hospital buildings (Poulis et al 1993, Larson et al 2003, Aycicek et al 2006, Redsven et al 2007.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one study by Pesonen-Leinonen et al (2006b), contact angles provided tentative relationships between the surface characteristics, such as wettability and surface free energy, and the cleanability of plastic surfaces. Poulis et al 1993, Larson et al 2003, Kuisma et al 2005a, Aycicek et al 2006, Redsven et al 2007 Colorimetric Semi-quantitative. Suitable for field and laboratory studies Pitts et al 1998, Williamsson 1999, Tenorio Cavalcante et al 2004, Dondi et al 2005, Kuisma et al 2005a, Kuisma et al 2005b Optical methods (near infrared optical range) Semi-quantitative.…”
Section: Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low levels of RLU indicates that the measuring point is clean and free from organic and microbiological pollutants, when the RLU level is high, point should be considered as contaminated. When the value of RLU is to high it must be taken corrective action, for example extending the cleaning and disinfection, increasing the concentration of the cleaning and disinfecting agent or changing the applied formulation [33].…”
Section: Hygiene Monitoring In Food Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%