2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2015.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of rigid and flexible endoscopy for removing esophageal foreign bodies in an emergency

Abstract: Both FE and RE remove esophageal FBs successfully, as evidenced by their high success rates, low complication rates, and high detection rates. Although FE under local anesthesia is a less time-consuming procedure for adults, RE under general anesthesia may be preferable for children and can serve as an alternative to FE.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that physiologically lacking of teeth and swallowing disorders occur with the increase in age may contribute to the high risk of FB ingestion in elderly patients. 7,15,16 And the custom of talking while eating may be the direct trigger. Moreover, age >50 to 60 years was identified as a risk factor for complications in several studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that physiologically lacking of teeth and swallowing disorders occur with the increase in age may contribute to the high risk of FB ingestion in elderly patients. 7,15,16 And the custom of talking while eating may be the direct trigger. Moreover, age >50 to 60 years was identified as a risk factor for complications in several studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that in some series for a fraction of patients (24%) who applied to the emergency departments with foreign body ingestion or food impaction, the object could not be identified using endoscopy. [15] If the object is radiolucent, it is almost invisible in radiographs. The lump sensation, odynophagia, or dysphagia could persist for a short time due to the irritation of mucosa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rigid endoscopy is preferably used for the removal of foreign body from the esophagus in some eastern clinical practices with high success rates and low complica-tions. [15,16] The authors have advocated that rigid endoscopy is more appropriate for proximal esophagus and more advantageous to remove the bigger chunks of food or foreign body due to the wider lumen for manipulation. However, some studies have claimed that the procedural duration is longer in rigid endoscopy compared to flexible and that the latter provides better examination of the esophageal mucosa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Removal of FB was mainly performed by rigid and exible endoscopy according to the localization of the FB and symptoms of the patient and was successful in 81% and 90%, respectively. High success rates for rigid and exible endoscopy have been reported in retrospective studies for oesophageal FB in children and adults with low rate of complications [12,36,42,43]. The management of foreign body, food and toxic substance ingestions needs to be adapted for infants, e.g.…”
Section: Ingestion Of Foreign Bodies or Chemical Substances Is Frequementioning
confidence: 99%