2020
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of risk factor associations in UK Biobank against representative, general population based studies with conventional response rates: prospective cohort study and individual participant meta-analysis

Abstract: ObjectiveTo compare established associations between risk factors and mortality in UK Biobank, a study with an exceptionally low rate of response to its baseline survey, against those from representative studies that have conventional response rates.DesignProspective cohort study alongside individual participant meta-analysis of other cohort studies.SettingUnited Kingdom.ParticipantsAnalytical sample of 499 701 people (response rate 5.5%) in analyses in UK Biobank; pooled data from the Health Surveys for Engla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

34
372
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 450 publications
(408 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(84 reference statements)
34
372
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the study was not designed to collect a representative sample of the UK population, which limits the generalizability of the findings to the UK as a whole. However, as a nationwide cohort, with a risk factor profile comparable to those in other representative studies in the UK [38], the results obtained from this study may reinforce the need for lowering the threshold for treating HTN in adults in the UK.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Second, the study was not designed to collect a representative sample of the UK population, which limits the generalizability of the findings to the UK as a whole. However, as a nationwide cohort, with a risk factor profile comparable to those in other representative studies in the UK [38], the results obtained from this study may reinforce the need for lowering the threshold for treating HTN in adults in the UK.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Although UK Biobank includes participants from multiple regions across the UK, including deprived areas, it is not a representative sample of the whole UK population 11 and this cohort may have suffered from selection bias, 42 although the direction of risk factor associations in the UK Biobank seem to be generalisable. 43 As in every observational study, there may be some residual confounding by unmeasured risk factors. Some of the results may be influenced by detection bias, as comorbidities may affect both biomarker concentrations and prostate specific antigen test attendance and/or results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite low response rates potentially leading to more favorable risk factor profiles, exposure-outcome associations in the UKB seem to be generalisable. 48 The comprehensive phenotyping of individuals in the cohort allowed us to correct for multiple potential confounding factors. In contrast to previous work utilizing cohorts with manifest PD, the availability of baseline blood tests and longitudinal assessment of PD diagnosis enabled us to examine the association between leukocyte subsets and risk of incident PD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%