2007
DOI: 10.1644/06-mamm-a-135r1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Sampling Methods for Inventory of Bat Communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
82
0
14

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
82
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Only helminth species considered as component (prevalence ≥ 10%, Bush et al, 1997) were analysed and interpreted. The standardized residuals after the log-linear analyses were used to represent the degree of deviance from the null model (no associations between factors), and the statistical significance within levels of a factor was verified examining the components of maximum likelihood, comparing these values with the critical level of significance for 1 degree of freedom (Chi 2 = 3.84, P < 0.05) (Flaquer et al, 2007). Mean species richness and mean number of helminths per host depending on the treatment (burned and control) and the sex of the host were analysed with GLM (factorial twoway ANOVA), whereas tests on species abundance were performed with the Kruskal-Wallis test because of high parasite aggregation (Díaz & Alonso, 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only helminth species considered as component (prevalence ≥ 10%, Bush et al, 1997) were analysed and interpreted. The standardized residuals after the log-linear analyses were used to represent the degree of deviance from the null model (no associations between factors), and the statistical significance within levels of a factor was verified examining the components of maximum likelihood, comparing these values with the critical level of significance for 1 degree of freedom (Chi 2 = 3.84, P < 0.05) (Flaquer et al, 2007). Mean species richness and mean number of helminths per host depending on the treatment (burned and control) and the sex of the host were analysed with GLM (factorial twoway ANOVA), whereas tests on species abundance were performed with the Kruskal-Wallis test because of high parasite aggregation (Díaz & Alonso, 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future studies should focus on significantly increasing the number of sampling sites so that diversity could be analysed as counts and proportions. This should be done using several combinations of approaches (e.g., Flaquer et al 2007, Fischer et al 2009), and not only by using automatic recording devices for only on a single night per site, which would have some evident drawbacks (e.g., Collins and Jones 2009, Fischer et al 2009, Matos et al 2013, see also Adams et al 2012). Trapping and sexing of bats and searching for maternity roosts should be conducted to more precisely identify boundaries for reproduction in all occurring species at mean July temperatures below 13°C.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we tested a three-way log-linear model that included species, intensity and locality as the main factors. The standardised residuals after the log-linear analysis were used to represent the degree of deviance from the null model (no associations between factors); the statistical significance within levels of a factor was verified examining the components of maximum likelihood, comparing these values with the critical level of significance for 1 degree of freedom (χ 2 = 3.84, p<0.05) (Flaquer et al 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%