2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of scratching behaviour of growing pigs with sarcoptic mange before and after treatment, employing two distinct approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The climatic condition of the herd area was found to be favorable in respect of temperature and humidity for survival of mites outside the host, might be the reason for spread of infestation among the pigs. The rubbing of skin lesions due to mange infestation as observed in the present study been reported earlier along with detailed scratching behavior (Loewenstein et al 2006b). Although the parasite S. scabiei is considered as neglected parasite, but recently attention towards genetic studies on S. scabiei in general and immunodiagnosis of swine S. scabiei particularly has been given like other important parasites (Rambozzi et al 2007;Alasaad et al 2009).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The climatic condition of the herd area was found to be favorable in respect of temperature and humidity for survival of mites outside the host, might be the reason for spread of infestation among the pigs. The rubbing of skin lesions due to mange infestation as observed in the present study been reported earlier along with detailed scratching behavior (Loewenstein et al 2006b). Although the parasite S. scabiei is considered as neglected parasite, but recently attention towards genetic studies on S. scabiei in general and immunodiagnosis of swine S. scabiei particularly has been given like other important parasites (Rambozzi et al 2007;Alasaad et al 2009).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…These lesions were similar to those reported by (Das et al, 2010;Laha et al, 2015;OIE, 2016). The observed clinical signs observed in these study were pruritis, as a result, affected pigs showed rubbing of the skin against the wall of the pen, as reported by other authors (Loewenstein et al, 2006;Das et al, 2010;Laha et al, 2015;OIE, 2016). The diagnosis was performed as described by Soulsby,1986;OIE, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The lesions were characterised by reddening of the infested area, the formation of crusts, hyperkeratosis, and fall of hairs from the area with wrinkled, thickened, rough, raised and thick asbestos-like skin (Das et al 2010;Laha et al, 2015). The observed clinical sign seen in natural disease is pruritis which can be noticed by When pigs are rubbing their skin against the pen house wall (Loewenstein et al 2006Das et al 2010Laha et al, 2015: OIE, 2016. The hypersensitive form of the disease is mostly accompanied by pruritis while the chronic form is Fill with red papules characterised by crust (Rambozzi et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lesions were characterized by reddening of the infested area, formation of crusts, hyperkeratosis, and fall of hairs from the area with wrinkled, thickened, rough, raised and thick asbestos-like skin (Das et al 2010). The main clinical symptoms observed in the naturally infested pigs were pruritis as a result affected pigs showed rubbing of the skin against the wall of the pen (Loewenstein et al 2006b;Das et al 2010). The infestation may be a hypersensitive form, characterized by pruritis and the presence of small red papules or a chronic form, characterized by crusts (Rambozzi et al 2007).…”
Section: Pathological Lesions and Clinical Symptomsmentioning
confidence: 99%