2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.135504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of SDS and L-Methionine in promoting CO2 hydrate kinetics: Implication for hydrate-based CO2 storage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the leucine system, changing the methionine concentration has no effect on the gas uptake or the water to hydrate conversion as it is reportedly a KHP, as shown in Figure c. The results are consistent with literature that surfactants only serve as kinetic promoters for hydrate formation and have no effect on the final gas uptake. , Methionine concentration of 1.00 wt % results in the highest average final gas uptake of 85.96 ± 1.69 mmol CO 2 /mol of water and water to hydrate conversion of 53.30 ± 1.05%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar to the leucine system, changing the methionine concentration has no effect on the gas uptake or the water to hydrate conversion as it is reportedly a KHP, as shown in Figure c. The results are consistent with literature that surfactants only serve as kinetic promoters for hydrate formation and have no effect on the final gas uptake. , Methionine concentration of 1.00 wt % results in the highest average final gas uptake of 85.96 ± 1.69 mmol CO 2 /mol of water and water to hydrate conversion of 53.30 ± 1.05%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This wall-climbing effect is influenced by capillary action, in which solution is drawn upward from the bulk liquid to the hydrate formation reaction interface via capillary channels formed on the reactor wall. 38,39 Ten minutes after induction, the start of hydrate growth in the bulk solution is observed (Figure 2D). Twenty minutes after nucleation, the hydrates completely cover the observation window, with the origin of vein-like formation indicating hydrate thickening, as shown in Figure 2F.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this direction, sodium dodecyl sulfate (surface-active chemistries) and tetrahydrofuran have been considered the best kinetic and thermodynamic promoters, respectively. However, the biocompatibility of such chemicals and their impact on marine life have been the major challenges for their deployment in HBS processes. Recently, a new category of biocompatible chemistries such as amino acids , and biosurfactants has been broadly researched for their hydrate promotion and inhibition characteristics. Alike the surfactants, amino acids promote hydrate formation while employing the hydrophilic and hydrophobic moieties (e.g., carboxylic acid, amine groups, and a side chain). Cai et al reported significant improvement in the kinetics of CO 2 hydrate formation (CO 2 storage ∼356 mg/g or 84% water-to-hydrate conversion) in a static reactor while adding l -methionine amino acid (0.2 wt %) to water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ghozatloo et al 29 reported that compared with deionized water, using small graphene decreased the induction time by 61.07% while increasing the storage capacity by 12.9%. Liu et al 30 reported that L -Met as a kinetic promoter of CO 2 hydrate is superior to SDS and can be employed as an efficient, reliable, and ecofriendly kinetic promoter for the hydrate-based CO 2 sequestration technology. In this study, graphite carbon nitride (g-C 3 N 4 ) nanoparticles were applied to methane hydrate formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%