2018
DOI: 10.4103/1735-3327.240470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of sealing ability of ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate, biodentine, and ortho mineral trioxide aggregate for canal obturation by the fluid infiltration technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the MCT and OCT findings in this work, comparable outcomes were observed between Biodentine and MTA in the sealing ability, although to some extent, MTA demonstrated better performance than Biodentine. This was consistent with other studies [13,14,[40][41][42], which found that MTA and Biodentine showed similar adaptation. MTA is expected to exhibit excellent adaptation is likely attributable to its expansion over time while it sets, which may reduce the gap within the cavity [43].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Based on the MCT and OCT findings in this work, comparable outcomes were observed between Biodentine and MTA in the sealing ability, although to some extent, MTA demonstrated better performance than Biodentine. This was consistent with other studies [13,14,[40][41][42], which found that MTA and Biodentine showed similar adaptation. MTA is expected to exhibit excellent adaptation is likely attributable to its expansion over time while it sets, which may reduce the gap within the cavity [43].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The materials employed in this clinical procedure should possess the ability to consistently provide sealing, exhibit good biocompatibility, ensure effective adhesion to root canal walls and maintain dimensional stability. Additionally, it is imperative for these materials to be hydrophilic [17,18], with a low solubility, be easy to handle and have a short setting time and good radiopacity [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MTA-Angelus is an effective antifungal agent, and it demonstrates a lower flexural strength than ProRoot MTA. [166][167][168] Many CSC materials demonstrate acceptable antibacterial products; the most resistant bacteria was E. faecalis, which was not susceptible at all, except to Endocem MTA in disc diffusion test. 167 The advantages of these calcium silicate materials over the typically used CH products lie in the higher mechanical strength, lower solubility, and tighter sealing to dentine.…”
Section: Calcium Silicate Cements(cscs)mentioning
confidence: 99%