2015
DOI: 10.13005/bpj/788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Second Molar Eruption Pattern in Skeletal Class I and Class III Malocclusions among 8 9 Years old Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some researchers reported the recurrence of lesions after replacement with composite resin (67,68). However, some believe it is caused by plaque accumulation in the lesions and is not a true recurrence (69)(70)(71). If the clinical diagnosis is in doubt or the mucosal changes do not respond to the proposed treatment, a biopsy should be performed.…”
Section: Treatment and Prognosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers reported the recurrence of lesions after replacement with composite resin (67,68). However, some believe it is caused by plaque accumulation in the lesions and is not a true recurrence (69)(70)(71). If the clinical diagnosis is in doubt or the mucosal changes do not respond to the proposed treatment, a biopsy should be performed.…”
Section: Treatment and Prognosismentioning
confidence: 99%