SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2013 2013
DOI: 10.1190/segam2013-1306.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of seismic diffraction imaging techniques: Plane wave destruction versus apex destruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A workflow that uses plane wave destruction for diffraction imaging is shown below. Flat-wave destruction of common shift data may have difficulty in extracting diffractions in regions with complex geological and velocity variations [11] (Figure 3).…”
Section: Diffraction Separation Methods From Seismic Full-wave Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A workflow that uses plane wave destruction for diffraction imaging is shown below. Flat-wave destruction of common shift data may have difficulty in extracting diffractions in regions with complex geological and velocity variations [11] (Figure 3).…”
Section: Diffraction Separation Methods From Seismic Full-wave Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acoustic (seismic) impedance, Z=, Where V is the seismic wave velocity and ρ is density. Although seismic migration is now the one of the primary imaging tools employed in the field, the earliest analogue seismic records took the form of simple single-fold illustration [4,[9][10][11][12]. These recordings were characterized by diffracted energy and random noise, but they nonetheless provided a useful interpretation of the subsoil of the Earth.…”
Section: Diffractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A workflow which uses the plane wave destruction for diffraction imaging is shown below. Plane-wave destruction of common-offset data may face difficulties extracting diffractions in regions which have a complex geology and velocity variation [16]. Figure 5 shows the work flow employed in the preservation of diffraction by using plane-wave destruction filter.…”
Section: Diffraction Separation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of diffractions in high-resolution structural imaging has been emphasized in many recent publications (Khaidukov et al, 2004;Kozlov et al, 2004;Fomel et al, 2006;Landa et al, 2008;Moser and Howard, 2008;Moser, 2009;Klokov et al, 2010;Dell and Gajewski, 2011;Koren and Ravve, 2011;Klokov and Fomel, 2012;Decker et al, 2013;Popovici et al, 2014;Sturzu et al, 2014), and diffraction imaging is emerging as a new tool in seismic interpretation. By careful preprocessing, the inherent redundancy of prestack seismic data can be used to separate the contribution of high-energy specular events from those of low-amplitude events scattered by local unconformities and heterogeneities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%