2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2018.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of self-report and objective measures of driving behavior and road safety: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of the fact that the reliability and usefulness of such self-reported measures of driving behaviours have been demonstrated by multiple recent studies (e.g. [8,64]), such studies may still retain some potential weaknesses, such as recall bias and self-serving bias [33], which to some extent make the reports of an individual's personal driving patterns less trustworthy. This study has attempted to address this issue by inviting participants to drive the simulator, and by performing context-based interviews to gain new and in-depth insights of those parameters which can be used to define driving styles and which should be incorporated into a personalised AV system.…”
Section: Design Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of the fact that the reliability and usefulness of such self-reported measures of driving behaviours have been demonstrated by multiple recent studies (e.g. [8,64]), such studies may still retain some potential weaknesses, such as recall bias and self-serving bias [33], which to some extent make the reports of an individual's personal driving patterns less trustworthy. This study has attempted to address this issue by inviting participants to drive the simulator, and by performing context-based interviews to gain new and in-depth insights of those parameters which can be used to define driving styles and which should be incorporated into a personalised AV system.…”
Section: Design Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously DEA was used to calculate the road safety index for 21 European countries [16] and for ideal trauma management regarding road safety [21]. For the calculation of risk value for European countries: population, passenger-kilometers, and passenger cars were used as inputs and the number of fatalities as output [22,94]. Yearly comparative performance of road safety program was evaluated by the DEA technique [23,94].…”
Section: Road Accident Risk Index and Benchmarkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of that reason, hotspot identification of accident-prone locations remains a focal point of interests for transportation engineers. That is why a series of researches were involved in relationship analysis of accidents [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] in context of volume/capacity (V/C) [18,19,24,25], vehicles miles travelled (VMT) [17,[26][27][28][29], vehicles hours travelled (VHT) [25,30,31], speed [18,20,24,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38], flow [12,13,32,35,36,39], and geometric design [35,[40][41][42][43][44]. Different methods were applied to locate the risky road segments to be treated for safety level enhancement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though psychology conditions do not affect the driving actions directly, they can be used as indicators of the current physical status of the driver [14], which is because psychology conditions significantly affect judgment in the driving process. Physiological indicators, including the electroencephalogram (EEG) [15], electrocardiogram (ECG) [16], electromyography (EMG) [17], heart rate [18], eye gaze distribution [19], saccade range, blink frequency [20], and so on, were used to measure drivers’ physical status. Data were collected either in the field driving environment or on a driving simulator [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%