2017 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/ijcnn.2017.7966418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of semantic segmentation approaches for horizon/sky line detection

Abstract: Horizon or skyline detection plays a vital role towards mountainous visual geo-localization, however most of the recently proposed visual geo-localization approaches rely on user-in-the-loop skyline detection methods. Detecting such a segmenting boundary fully autonomously would definitely be a step forward for these localization approaches. This paper provides a quantitative comparison of four such methods for autonomous horizon/sky line detection on an extensive data set. Specifically, we provide the compari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this probabilistic approach is general enough to include horizon detection if needed. Semantic segmentation approach is evaluated by Ahmad et al (2017) on land-sky images under various weather and illumination conditions. Fully convolutional network performed the best on said images, but further post processing is required to improve the segmentation.…”
Section: Ann-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this probabilistic approach is general enough to include horizon detection if needed. Semantic segmentation approach is evaluated by Ahmad et al (2017) on land-sky images under various weather and illumination conditions. Fully convolutional network performed the best on said images, but further post processing is required to improve the segmentation.…”
Section: Ann-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar solution is investigated by Hung et al (2013), where a support vector machine is trained for classifying skyline and non-skyline edge segments. A comparison of four autonomous skyline segmentation techniques that use machine learning is reviewed by Ahmad et al (2017). The above-mentioned studies focus only skyline extraction, and their outcomes are hard to compare with the results of this paper.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, It needs prior knowledge of sky region. To detect the horizon /sky line, to focus on visual geo-localization based on accurate detection of skyline, to develop algorithms for semantic segmentation [3] proposed classical feature learning method, patch-wise classifier training method, deep-learning network methods(FNN, SegNet) respectively for publicly available CH1 data set. But, learning techniques are more complex.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%