2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of sensory product profiles generated by trained assessors and consumers using CATA questions: Four case studies with complex and/or similar samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

13
76
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
13
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method includes not only sensory but also hedonic items, and those relating to purchase intention or affective links (Parente, Ares, & Manzoni, ; Varela & Ares, ). In addition to being quick and easy to carry out, the CATA question has been reported to provide descriptive profiles similar to those that can be obtained using trained sensory panels (Ares, Antúnez, et al, ; Ares, Etchemendy, et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The method includes not only sensory but also hedonic items, and those relating to purchase intention or affective links (Parente, Ares, & Manzoni, ; Varela & Ares, ). In addition to being quick and easy to carry out, the CATA question has been reported to provide descriptive profiles similar to those that can be obtained using trained sensory panels (Ares, Antúnez, et al, ; Ares, Etchemendy, et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…A CATA question was included in the questionnaire to allow the consumers to characterize each sample and to verify the design of the sensory strategies. It has been shown that studies with a total of 60 to 80 untrained study subjects can successfully characterize samples using CATA, especially samples with a higher degree of differences (Ares and others , ). The consumers were asked to check all descriptors that they felt applied to that sample, and to leave those descriptors that did not apply to the sample unchecked.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple Factor Analysis (MFA) was then performed to explore relationships across countries and with intensities of descriptive sensory attributes evaluated by trained panelists (Stages 2 and 3) (Abdi, Williams, & Valentin, ; Escofier & Pagès, ). To analyze similarities between sample configurations obtained from consumers across European countries, and between consumers and trained panelists in Europe and Senegal, regression vectors (RV) coefficients were used (Ares et al, ; Robert & Escoufier, ) and their significance evaluated at p < .01 (highly significant). The RV coefficient is a multivariate generalization of the Pearson correlation coefficient that measures the relationship between two sets of variables defined for the same individuals (Abdi, ; Josse, Pagès, & Husson, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensory vocabulary used by untrained professionals, or even by consumers, may also provide relevant product descriptions for marketing research, sales and customer support (Hayakawa et al, ; Kim & Lee, ). Moreover, its reliability can be assessed by comparison against sensory lexicons developed by trained panelists (Ares et al, ; Blancher, Clavier, Egoroff, Duineveld, & Parcon, ; Worch, Lê, & Punter, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%