2004
DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000071352.95491.75
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Serum and Cerebrospinal Fluid Protein S-100b Levels After Severe Head Injury and Their Prognostic Importance

Abstract: The results show that CSF S-100b levels clearly are superior to serum S-100b levels for predicting outcome after severe head injury.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this analysis, we collapsed GOS scores into three groups (1, 2/3, and 4/5). For DRS, subjects were analyzed in three groups: none-to-partial disability (score, 0-3); moderate-to-severe disability (score, [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], and extremely severe disability to death (score, [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. 41 …”
Section: Outcome Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this analysis, we collapsed GOS scores into three groups (1, 2/3, and 4/5). For DRS, subjects were analyzed in three groups: none-to-partial disability (score, 0-3); moderate-to-severe disability (score, [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], and extremely severe disability to death (score, [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. 41 …”
Section: Outcome Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Another early study demonstrates that CSF S100b levels are more predictive of outcome than serum S100b levels, citing that serum S100b may be derived more from an impaired BBB than intraparenchymal pathology. 26,27 However, it is not yet fully understood whether serum S100b levels are primarily associated with extent of brain damage or BBB integrity. A second limitation of S100b is that the peripheral origins, or source contributions, of serum S100b are not fully elucidated, and serum levels may be attributed to extracerebral injuries, such as bone fracture, burns, and muscle injury.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have used average biomarker levels to predict TBI outcome. 4,6,7,11 Others have used peak levels, 8,18 levels obtained during the first day after injury, 5,19,20 whereas others have used arbitrary cutoffs. 5,[9][10][11]20 Recent research from our group has assessed temporal biomarker profiles in evaluating TBI prognosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Several cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum biomarkers have shown promise in predicting long-term outcome after severe TBI. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] One particular marker of interest in TBI is S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100b), a protein expressed in mature astrocytes whose foot processes contribute to the bloodbrain barrier (BBB). S100b easily extravasates into the serum as a result of BBB compromise, making it a potentially logical choice as a candidate biomarker for TBI diagnosis and prognosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, CSF S-100B is used as a marker protein in humans to detect brain damage. Increased concentrations of CSF S-100B have been reported in patients with brain injury [10] or with Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease [4,6]. In veterinary diagnosis, Green et al [2] first used this CSF protein in the assessment of cattle with suspected bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%