1992
DOI: 10.1177/000456329202900406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Seven Formulae and Isoelectrofocusing for Determination of Intrathecally Produced IgG in Neurological Diseases

Abstract: SUMMARY. Seven different formulae and agarose isoelectrofocusing (AIF) using immunolabelIing for IgG were compared for their ability to discriminate between intrathecally produced IgG and transudated IgG in cerebrospinal fluid. All reference limits were set to a specificity of 97' 5070 (reference group, n = 211). The probability of a positive test (p+) was evaluated for 112 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), 42 with meningitis, 114 with noninflammatory diseases affecting the central nervous system (CNS), … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the isolated finding of free light chain oligoclonal bands is a nonspecific finding and may argue against the diagnosis of MS. 23,25,26 Sensitivities for detecting oligoclonal banding using IEF with immunoblotting are in excess of 95% (Table 2). 11,[16][17][18][19] Although we do not yet understand the precise role of oligoclonal bands in MS, their presence is tightly coupled (Ͼ95%) with the disease and, thus, can provide a useful supplement to the diagnosis. The evidence for studies from approximately 3000 patients (Table 2) is presented from individual publications using IEF with immunofixation on more than 500 patients for sensitivity and for specificity using prospective studies with follow-up exceeding 2 years.…”
Section: Qualitative Methods In Csf Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the isolated finding of free light chain oligoclonal bands is a nonspecific finding and may argue against the diagnosis of MS. 23,25,26 Sensitivities for detecting oligoclonal banding using IEF with immunoblotting are in excess of 95% (Table 2). 11,[16][17][18][19] Although we do not yet understand the precise role of oligoclonal bands in MS, their presence is tightly coupled (Ͼ95%) with the disease and, thus, can provide a useful supplement to the diagnosis. The evidence for studies from approximately 3000 patients (Table 2) is presented from individual publications using IEF with immunofixation on more than 500 patients for sensitivity and for specificity using prospective studies with follow-up exceeding 2 years.…”
Section: Qualitative Methods In Csf Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most popular formulae, IgG index [167], IgG synthesis rate [168] (both are linear approaches) and IgG Loc [128] (a non-linear approach) are of similar clinical sensitivity in MS. Nevertheless, the use of a non-linear relation between the Ig quotient and the albumin quotient is recommended when there is BBB dysfunction, since a linear approach leads to a loss of sensitivity [1,84,128,198]. These bands of restricted heterogeneity were designated as oligoclonal in contrast to the normal electrophoretically heterogeneous polyclonal Ig pattern.…”
Section: S Evaluation Of Intrathecal Immunoglobulins Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selective increase in the C S F Ig G level has been observed consistendy in M S and it has become an impor tant laboratory test for confirmation o f the diagnosis (Poser et al, 1983). A selective C S F Ig G increase can be estab lished by using the Ig G Index (L in k and Tibbling, 1977), formulas for intrathecal produced Ig G (Reiber and Felgenhauer, 1987;Ohman et al, 1992) or by detection o f C S F restricted oligoclonal Ig G bands (W alk e r et al, 1983;Luxton et al, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%