2020 Medical Technologies Congress (TIPTEKNO) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/tiptekno50054.2020.9299316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Several Machine Learning Classifiers for Arousal Classification: A Preliminary study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The manipulation of certain elements in the current VRET was successful in reducing anxiety. Going forward, machine learning could be used to identify the best candidate indicators of arousal, such as galvanic skin response (GSR), pupil diameter, heart rate (HR), and electromyography ( 77 ). Offering participants biofeedback about such arousal from heartrate and electroencephalography could enhance response to exposure therapy for SAD ( 78 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The manipulation of certain elements in the current VRET was successful in reducing anxiety. Going forward, machine learning could be used to identify the best candidate indicators of arousal, such as galvanic skin response (GSR), pupil diameter, heart rate (HR), and electromyography ( 77 ). Offering participants biofeedback about such arousal from heartrate and electroencephalography could enhance response to exposure therapy for SAD ( 78 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%