2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1467-2995.2003.00133_10.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of sevoflurane and isoflurane anesthetic index in unpremedicated dogs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of hypercapnia was not unexcepted as general anaesthesia causes dose-dependent hypoventilation. 27 No difference between the two centres was found despite IPPV was more commonly implemented at centre A. The prevalence of hypercapnia reported here is lower than the 92% previously found.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…The prevalence of hypercapnia was not unexcepted as general anaesthesia causes dose-dependent hypoventilation. 27 No difference between the two centres was found despite IPPV was more commonly implemented at centre A. The prevalence of hypercapnia reported here is lower than the 92% previously found.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…The same occurred with regard to ETCO 2 , as both groups maintained the parameter within the normal range for the species, although inhalational anesthetics may promote an increase in ETCO 2 values as a result of respiratory depression [35]. SpO 2 and ETCO 2 were not obtained at baseline time (M0) due to the di culty of evaluation through the equipment used, as the animals were conscious.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…O ETCO 2 é infl uenciado pela f, e esta não diferiu de M0 em nenhum momento, mantendo assim a ETCO 2 estável durante todo o estudo. Levando em consideração o protocolo utilizado neste estudo, é conhecido que o isofl uorano promove depressão respiratória dosedependente (GALLOWAY et al, 2003). No entanto, como a vaporização foi mantida em 1,3V%, não foram observadas diferenças entre tempos ou entre grupos durante o procedimento, sendo os valores aceitáveis para a espécie.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified