2012
DOI: 10.1029/2011jd017346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of shadow‐ring correction models for diffuse solar irradiance

Abstract: [1] Reliable and accurate measurements of diffuse solar irradiance are needed in order to partition global irradiance into its direct and diffuse components. Diffuse irradiance is commonly measured using sun tracking systems or shadow rings. Data obtained using a shadow ring must be corrected for the portion of diffuse irradiance blocked by the ring. In this paper we have examined and evaluated six of the most widely used correction models. Approaches that account for radiation anisotropy perform notably bette… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies confirm that measurements with shadow-rings are comparable to those given by more shadow-ring width-radius ratio (-) q ground isotropic reflectance (-) sophisticated tracking devices under totally cloudy skies, while some differences appear under clear sky conditions (Drummond, 1964;Robinson and Stoch, 1964;Sánchez et al, 2012). This phenomenon can be explained due to the anisotropy effects in the atmosphere and they can be corrected by applying different correction models, supplementary to the geometrical correction model.…”
Section: Measuring Diffuse Solar Irradiancementioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some studies confirm that measurements with shadow-rings are comparable to those given by more shadow-ring width-radius ratio (-) q ground isotropic reflectance (-) sophisticated tracking devices under totally cloudy skies, while some differences appear under clear sky conditions (Drummond, 1964;Robinson and Stoch, 1964;Sánchez et al, 2012). This phenomenon can be explained due to the anisotropy effects in the atmosphere and they can be corrected by applying different correction models, supplementary to the geometrical correction model.…”
Section: Measuring Diffuse Solar Irradiancementioning
confidence: 66%
“…Thus, if we want to improve measurement accuracy, we should in addition apply satisfactory adequate models (Sánchez et al, 2012;Ineichen et al, 1983;Brunger and Hooper, 1993;Kudish and Evseev, 2008).…”
Section: Geometrical Correction Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The global UVR on a horizontal plane is monitored in a number of locations across the world, including the Public Health England monitoring network in the UK; it also could be done directly at the location of the population study . The main challenge is the retrieval of the diffuse component of solar radiation as it requires an expensive tracking system of sun position or using shadowing rings with regular azimuthal adjustments and corrections for radiation shadowed by the ring . This consideration often makes deployment of such equipment impractical in field studies which require monitoring of personal UV exposures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7] For the particular case of total solar diffuse radiation measured by pyranometers, i.e., diffuse radiation spectrally integrated throughout the whole solar interval (0.285-2.800 mm), several authors have proposed different correction models [Drummond, 1956;Steven, 1984;LeBaron et al, 1990;Batlles et al, 1995;Muneer and Zhang, 2002]. These models have been validated by comparison with experimental measurements at different locations [López et al, 2004a[López et al, , 2004bKudish and Evseev, 2008;Sánchez et al, 2012] and are widely accepted to provide accurate and reliable total solar irradiance values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%