Comparison of shear bond strength of different universal adhesive systems using the modes etch and rinse and self etch

Cebe, Mehmet Ata; Bıcakcı, Hasan; Zencirli, Omer; Cebe, Fatma

doi:10.5152/eurjther.2016.03038

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The initial literature review identified records of 2,880 duplicates. In addition to 1,177 studies reviewed in the title and abstract, 45 studies were left to be read in full, 31 of them were not included, among them, 13 articles evaluate dentin micro-shear bond strength which was different from dentin micro-tensile bonding strength [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] .…”

Section: Search Strategymentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of bond strength of universal adhesives using different etching modes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This review aims to evaluate whether the etch-and-rinse or self-etch mode is the better protocol for dentin adhesion by universal adhesives. A total of 15 articles were included in the meta-analysis. Two reviewers performed a literature search up to October 2020 in four databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Without considering the difference in aging mode, the analysis of the immediate and long-term bond strength of dentin showed that there was no statistical significance between the etch-and-rinse and self-etch mode of universal adhesive, and the long-term bond strength decreased relative to the immediate. In vitro studies suggest that prior acid etching did not improve bond performance. Whether from the perspective of long-term bonding performance or simplifying operating procedures, the self-etch mode is preferred.

show abstract