2019
DOI: 10.1007/s40999-019-00408-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Shear Wave Velocity Prediction Models to Yangtze River Deltaic Sediments Based on Piezocone Test Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The field measured values for the N in both boreholes 1 and 2 range from 9 to 17. Thus, the bounds on the variation of shear wave velocity with N values to simulate the real field data may be represented by both (6,7).…”
Section: ( )( )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The field measured values for the N in both boreholes 1 and 2 range from 9 to 17. Thus, the bounds on the variation of shear wave velocity with N values to simulate the real field data may be represented by both (6,7).…”
Section: ( )( )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8, d-f also displays the depthdependent change in the cyclic strength ratio (CSR) for the soil condition in bore hole 2. The CSR was calculated depending on the upper limit of the shear wave velocity that is given by (7). The results of Figs.…”
Section: ( )( )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are two types of shear wave velocity tests: laboratory tests and on-site tests. The former includes resonant column tests, bending element tests, torsional shear tests, and instrumented triaxial tests, while the latter includes tests such as spectral analysis of surface waves (SASW), downhole testing (DHT), and cross-hole testing (CHT) [3]. Laboratory-tested 𝑉 𝑆 , however, is affected by sample disturbances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%