2011
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.2730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of single and joint effects of Zn and Cu in continuous flow and batch reactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed biomass and glucose concentrations with time for the four reactor treatments are given in Figs , for each of the reactors 1–4, respectively. As discussed by Sengor et al, the metal‐free control reactor (# 1) showed nearly constant OD values, around 0.13, while glucose concentrations were below detection throughout the experimental period (Fig. ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The observed biomass and glucose concentrations with time for the four reactor treatments are given in Figs , for each of the reactors 1–4, respectively. As discussed by Sengor et al, the metal‐free control reactor (# 1) showed nearly constant OD values, around 0.13, while glucose concentrations were below detection throughout the experimental period (Fig. ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Four similar parallel completely mixed flow reactors, operating under identical conditions (apart from the concentration of toxic metal) were used to investigate the impact of single and joint exposure of Zn and Cu on Arthrobacter sp. Our previous study demonstrated the significance of continuous flow conditions on the microbial growth and toxicity of Zn and Cu. As a continuation of that work, the current study presented here explored the impact of individual and combined exposure of these toxic metals on the energy status (in terms of ATP pool) and tolerance of surviving microorganisms growing in continuous systems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations