2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12560-021-09477-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Skimmed Milk and Lanthanum Flocculation for Concentration of Pathogenic Viruses in Water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding recovery rates of MgV, used as a model on non-enveloped viruses, higher recoveries were obtained when the TNA method was used. These recovery rates (mean 33.7 %) were similar to the ones obtained by Borgmästars et al (2021) for MgV and human enteric viruses (Norovirus GI and GII, and HAV) with skimmed milk flocculation (SMF). However, with the SMF technique, 10 L were used for sample concentration, while with the TNA method only 40 mL were processed, simplifying the whole procedure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Regarding recovery rates of MgV, used as a model on non-enveloped viruses, higher recoveries were obtained when the TNA method was used. These recovery rates (mean 33.7 %) were similar to the ones obtained by Borgmästars et al (2021) for MgV and human enteric viruses (Norovirus GI and GII, and HAV) with skimmed milk flocculation (SMF). However, with the SMF technique, 10 L were used for sample concentration, while with the TNA method only 40 mL were processed, simplifying the whole procedure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…recovery used in this study was determined by the authors that designed this viral concentration method and it has been used by several authors worldwide (Assis et al, 2018;Borgmästars et al, 2021;Calgua et al, 2013;Gonzales-Gustavson et al, 2017;Shubo et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did not perform experiments in order to calculate the recovery efficiency of the protocol used in this study. However, the recovery efficiency used in this study was determined by the authors that designed this viral concentration method and it has been used by several authors worldwide (Assis et al, 2018; Borgmästars et al, 2021; Calgua et al, 2013; Gonzales‐Gustavson et al, 2017; Shubo et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RT-qPCR was performed with RT at 50 °C for 15 min, inactivation of the reverse transcriptase and activation of the DNA polymerase at 95 °C for 2 min, followed by 45 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 3 s, annealing and elongation at 60 °C for 30 s. Cycle of quantification (Cq) values were determined by the LightCycler 96 software, version 1.1 (Roche). Quantification was performed using a tenfold dilution series of linearised plasmid DNA with a norovirus GI insert, as previously described [ 27 ]. The standard curve ranged from 5·10 5 to 50 plasmid equivalents per reaction.…”
Section: Case Study: Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%