2003
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/18.1.101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of skinfold thicknesses and bioelectrical impedance analysis with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of body fat in patients on long-term haemodialysis therapy

Abstract: The simple and long established method of SKF was preferable over BIA, which showed gender-specific variability in the assessment of body fat in patients undergoing haemodialysis. However, more comparative and longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate the applicability of these practical methods for monitoring body composition in the routine care of patients with chronic renal failure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
73
0
8

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
8
73
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with other research (Fuller et al, 1994), our findings indicated that skinfold measurements are less accurate than BIA in estimating BF, although there is still debate in this area (Kamimura et al, 2003;Norgan, 2005). The adjusted R 2 for the novel Tanita instrument equation is higher than the one derived for skinfolds; thus indicating further variation is explained by the Tanita system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In agreement with other research (Fuller et al, 1994), our findings indicated that skinfold measurements are less accurate than BIA in estimating BF, although there is still debate in this area (Kamimura et al, 2003;Norgan, 2005). The adjusted R 2 for the novel Tanita instrument equation is higher than the one derived for skinfolds; thus indicating further variation is explained by the Tanita system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Skinfold measurement at four standard sites (biceps, triceps, subscapular and suprailiac) was performed for determining body fat, as the method seems to be superior to bioelectrical impedance analysis for the measurement of this compartment (Kamimura et al, 2003). Body density was calculated from the sum of the four skinfold measurements according to Durnin and Womersley (1974), and the percentage of body fat was then calculated by Siri's (1961) equation . Resting energy expenditure REE measurements were obtained by indirect calorimetry using an open-circuit ventilated computerized metabolic system (Vmax series 29n; SensorMedics Corp; Yorba Linda, CA, USA).…”
Section: Study Design and Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16] In addition, analysis of body composition with different techniques, such as bioelectrical impedance analysis [BIA] and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry [DEXA], has also been used to determine nutritional status in this population. [17][18][19] Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry is the gold standard for evaluating body composition in HD patients because this method measures three body components: fat mass, lean body mass, and bone. [20] However, this technique is expensive and not available at all centers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%