2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000165186.79097.6c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Small-Intestinal Submucosa and Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene as a Vascular Conduit in the Presence of Gram-Positive Contamination

Abstract: Compared with ePTFE, SIS induces host tissue remodeling, exhibits a decreased neointimal response to infection, and is resistant to bacterial colonization. SIS may provide a superior alternative to ePTFE as a vascular conduit for peripheral vascular surgery.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Such biological scaffolds have been surprisingly resistant to bacterial infection, [13][14][15][16] even in clinical applications that are at high risk for bacterial contamination. [17][18][19][20] Generally, naturally occurring biomaterials such as those composed of purified collagen or intact ECM are more resistant to bacterial infection than synthetic biomaterials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Such biological scaffolds have been surprisingly resistant to bacterial infection, [13][14][15][16] even in clinical applications that are at high risk for bacterial contamination. [17][18][19][20] Generally, naturally occurring biomaterials such as those composed of purified collagen or intact ECM are more resistant to bacterial infection than synthetic biomaterials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17][18][19][20] Generally, naturally occurring biomaterials such as those composed of purified collagen or intact ECM are more resistant to bacterial infection than synthetic biomaterials. [13][14][15][16]21 Porcine-derived ECM composed of small intestinal sub-mucosa (SIS) has been successfully used as a resorbable biological scaffold for tissue-engineering applications in more than 500,000 human patients and has shown resistance to deliberate bacterial infection in preclinical studies. [13][14][15][16] The antibacterial activity associated with the SIS-ECM is not a property of the intact ECM itself, 22 but rather of the degradation products of the ECM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…iologic scaffolds composed of extracellular matrix (ECM) can promote the constructive remodeling of injured tissues through mechanisms that include angiogenesis, [1][2][3][4][5] the recruitment of multipotential progenitor cells to the site of tissue reconstruction, [6][7][8][9] the release of antimicrobial peptides, [10][11][12][13][14][15] and activation of the alternative pathway of immunity. [16][17][18][19][20] There is convincing evidence that hostmediated degradation of ECM scaffolds is typically completed within 8-12 weeks and is necessary to realize the full beneficial effects of ECM-mediated tissue remodeling, [21][22][23] but the mechanisms by which such scaffold degradation occurs have been largely ignored.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 There are numerous, mostly experimental, reports on the application of ECM bioscaffolds in the repair and reconstitution of many soft tissue structures with variable success. Tissues include the lower urinary tract, [35][36][37] laryngeal cartilage, 38 esophagus, 39 abdominal wall, [40][41][42][43][44][45] diaphragm, 46,47 dura mater, 48 blood vessels, [49][50][51] tendons, [52][53][54][55][56] ligaments, 57,58 fascia, 59 menisci, [60][61][62][63] and bone. 64 Both commercially available ECM matrices on the veterinary market are promoted as implantable products to accelerate wound healing in dogs and cats.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%