1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf02684906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of small-scale methods for the rapid extraction of plant DNA suitable for PCR analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microsatellites were amplified from leaf extract following a modified version of the protocol presented by Wang et al . (1993) and tested by Rogers et al . (1996).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microsatellites were amplified from leaf extract following a modified version of the protocol presented by Wang et al . (1993) and tested by Rogers et al . (1996).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We extracted genomic DNA from the dried samples using an isopropanol precipitation method (Rogers et al. ), and characterized samples at eight microsatellite loci previously isolated from B. rapa or close relatives (Suwabe et al. ; Lowe et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Choice of DNA isolation method depends upon the type of sample in respect to purity and yield of the DNA obtainable. Several methods have been described [23][24][25] and numerous commercial kits are available for DNA isolation from plant tissues, based on different methodologies. Most of these methods have been optimized for DNA isolation from plant tissues but in this study we have developed a novel method which is able to isolate genomic DNA of bacteria, infesting potato tubers.…”
Section: Pcr Amplificationmentioning
confidence: 99%