2019
DOI: 10.14744/ijmb.2019.69188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of small-volume tubes with vacuum blood tubes for complete blood count

Abstract: Comparison of small-volume tubes and vacuum blood tubes for complete blood count T he complete blood count (CBC) is one of the most commonly requested clinical laboratory tests [1]. Accurate measurement of the CBC is essential for the correct diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients with hematological disorders. These measurements are now almost fully automated, and the right interpretation of the clinical significance of the results requires knowledge of the pre-analytical phases [2]. The blood collect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem of blood tube underfilling has received much less attention in the area of hematological testing, wherein there is widespread perception that a perturbation of the ratio between whole blood and the reference anticoagulant for hematological testing (i.e., dipotassium ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid; K2EDTA) (4), may not generate clinically significant bias in most tests results. Thus, although small volume blood tubes have now become available in the market for pediatric blood collection and for reducing diagnostic blood loss (especially in anemic and critical patients), they were found to display a clinically significant bias compared to standard volume tubes for hemostasis assays (5), and also for hematological testing, with the bias of hemoglobin, hematocrit and red blood cell (RBC) values exceeding 14%, or with values becoming even lower than 10% for the platelet count (6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of blood tube underfilling has received much less attention in the area of hematological testing, wherein there is widespread perception that a perturbation of the ratio between whole blood and the reference anticoagulant for hematological testing (i.e., dipotassium ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid; K2EDTA) (4), may not generate clinically significant bias in most tests results. Thus, although small volume blood tubes have now become available in the market for pediatric blood collection and for reducing diagnostic blood loss (especially in anemic and critical patients), they were found to display a clinically significant bias compared to standard volume tubes for hemostasis assays (5), and also for hematological testing, with the bias of hemoglobin, hematocrit and red blood cell (RBC) values exceeding 14%, or with values becoming even lower than 10% for the platelet count (6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%