2020
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Smartphone Photography, Single-Lens Reflex Photography, and Field-Grading for Trachoma

Abstract: Conjunctival examination for trachomatous inflammation-follicular (TF) guides public health decisions for trachoma. Smartphone cameras may allow remote conjunctival grading, but previous studies have found low sensitivity. A random sample of 412 children aged 1-9 years received an in-person conjunctival examination and then had conjunctival photographs taken with 1) a single-lens reflex (SLR) camera and 2) a smartphone coupled to a 3D-printed magnifying attachment. Three masked graders assessed the conjunctiva… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This smartphone attachment, the Corneal CellScope, has been shown to be valid and reproducible for assessment of trachoma. 26,27,39 As in previous reports, the quality of the smartphone images captured for this trial was good, with only 2% of photographs judged to be ungradable. 26,27 Ungradable photographs were more likely to have been obtained for younger children, suggesting some association with participant cooperation.…”
Section: Jama Network Open | Ophthalmologysupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This smartphone attachment, the Corneal CellScope, has been shown to be valid and reproducible for assessment of trachoma. 26,27,39 As in previous reports, the quality of the smartphone images captured for this trial was good, with only 2% of photographs judged to be ungradable. 26,27 Ungradable photographs were more likely to have been obtained for younger children, suggesting some association with participant cooperation.…”
Section: Jama Network Open | Ophthalmologysupporting
confidence: 81%
“… 25 Ocular or blood samples that enable laboratory detection are primary ‘alternative indicator’ candidates, 10 as is the use of photography. 26 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional digital SLR cameras often require attachable macro lenses to be able to take a close-up image of the tarsal conjunctiva and the photographer often needs a second person to hold the child and evert the lid. Though attachable lenses for smartphones have been tested, certain newer smartphones come with a macro lens embedded though the resolution is reportedly low [ 7 ]. The ICAPS system builds on previous technologies to create a hands-free, head-mounted camera system enabling a single person to evert an eyelid, take an image without touching the equipment, label and save it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study evaluated an external attachment which allows the smartphone to take magnified images with greater image pixel-density dedicated to the eyelid [ 9 ]. It also used an external magnification attachment with supplementary light sources and a iPhone 4S smartphone, and reported 84.1% sensitivity and 97.6% specificity for TF [ 7 ]. Our system had high specificity, 98%, but lower sensitivity, 54%, compared to the field grade, though without a true gold standard assessment, we believe sensitivity and specificity could be misleading statistics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%