1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf02375149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of soil extractions by 0.01M CaCl2, by EUF and by some conventional extraction procedures

Abstract: SummaryThe extractive powers of different extraction procedures (Electro-Ultrafiltration, 0.01 M CaClz and standard Dutch methods) were compared mutually for a limited number of nutrients in soil samples from 21 locations. The results showed that for almost all parameters under study (Na, K, Mg, Mn, P, N) the methods are interchangeable. Drawbacks of the EUF technique are lower reproducibility of the results, laboriousness and high cost. Moreover, the extraction of exchangeable forms of Mn and Mg with this tec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
110
0
7

Year Published

1988
1988
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 234 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
110
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Sub-samples of 12 g soil were extracted at a ratio of 1:10 (dry soil weight/ extractant volume) with 0.01 mol/L CaCl 2 , shaken for 1 h and filtered. The filtrates were analyzed for mineral N with a TRAACS Model 2000 continuous flow autoanalyzer (Houba et al 1986). Water contents in the soil samples were determined gravimetrically to calculate soil N min on a dry soil basis.…”
Section: Sampling and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sub-samples of 12 g soil were extracted at a ratio of 1:10 (dry soil weight/ extractant volume) with 0.01 mol/L CaCl 2 , shaken for 1 h and filtered. The filtrates were analyzed for mineral N with a TRAACS Model 2000 continuous flow autoanalyzer (Houba et al 1986). Water contents in the soil samples were determined gravimetrically to calculate soil N min on a dry soil basis.…”
Section: Sampling and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one sub-sample, organic carbon (C) was determined by dichromate-oxidation . A second sub-sample was shaken for 2 h in 0.01 M CaCl 2 (mass ratio 1:10), centrifuged at 48,000g (Houba et al 1986(Houba et al , 1990; in the supernatant of the centrifuged suspension NH 4 -N and NO 3 -N were determined by using standard auto-analyser . The third sub-sample was digested in a mixture of H 2 SO 4 and salicylic acid and Se, to which H 2 O 2 was added .…”
Section: Chemical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 12-g sub-samples were extracted with 0.01 mol L À1 CaCl 2 at a ratio of 1:10 (dry soil wt/extractant volume) with shaking for 1 h and filtration of the extract. The filtrate was analyzed for nitrate and ammonium using a continuous flow autoanalyzer (TRAACS Model 2000) according to Houba et al (1986). Water in the soil samples was determined gravimetrically to calculate soil N min on a dry matter basis.…”
Section: Sampling and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%