2014
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of somatic mutation calling methods in amplicon and whole exome sequence data

Abstract: BackgroundHigh-throughput sequencing is rapidly becoming common practice in clinical diagnosis and cancer research. Many algorithms have been developed for somatic single nucleotide variant (SNV) detection in matched tumor-normal DNA sequencing. Although numerous studies have compared the performance of various algorithms on exome data, there has not yet been a systematic evaluation using PCR-enriched amplicon data with a range of variant allele fractions. The recently developed gold standard variant set for t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
139
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
8
139
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Variant calling was executed with GATK software and low quality variants (mapping quality below 30, read depth below 10 or frequency < 10%), were discarded (18). GATK has been proved to achieve higher sensitivity and specificity in exome variant calling than other softwares (19). Germline variants were also removed, i.e., variants that were present in normal adjacent paired sequence for each tumor, and variants reported in the 1000G project.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variant calling was executed with GATK software and low quality variants (mapping quality below 30, read depth below 10 or frequency < 10%), were discarded (18). GATK has been proved to achieve higher sensitivity and specificity in exome variant calling than other softwares (19). Germline variants were also removed, i.e., variants that were present in normal adjacent paired sequence for each tumor, and variants reported in the 1000G project.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is highly indicative that sequencing protocols and computational methods, including the read aligners, have a major impact on the sensitivity and specificity of SNV calling [27]. Specifically, the fraction of the variant allele as well as the coverage, i. e. the number of reads that are aligned to a site with a potential SNV are crucial determinants for the statistical benchmarks [35]. Additional rigorous postprocessing steps are suggested to improve the SNV calling.…”
Section: Genome Resequencing and Variation Callingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…VarScan 2 applies Fisher's exact test to the tumor and normal allele frequencies obtained from a pileup file (18). Strelka identifies low-allelic-fraction candidate mutations with high sensitivity, whereas VarScan 2 detects little low-allelic-fraction candidates (6,29). Therefore, tumor purity has a relatively higher impact on the numbers of variants detected by VarScan 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%