1976
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(76)90054-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of some methods for evaluating infinite range oscillatory integrals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Squire [10] also used this method as well as the algorithm and suggested the Levin transformation [23] as a promising alternative. Blakemore et al [3] have found Levin's transformation to be more efficient than the algorithm, albeit only marginally so. Bubenik [25] employed the algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Squire [10] also used this method as well as the algorithm and suggested the Levin transformation [23] as a promising alternative. Blakemore et al [3] have found Levin's transformation to be more efficient than the algorithm, albeit only marginally so. Bubenik [25] employed the algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since a significant fraction of the overall computational effort is typically spent on the tail integral, it is essential that this integration be done as efficiently as possible. The proven and most popular approach is the integration then summation procedure [2]- [4] in which the integral is evaluated as a sum of a series of partial integrals over finite subintervals as follows: (2) with (3) where with and is a sequence of suitably selected interpolation points. These break points may be selected based on the asymptotic behavior of the integrand .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these integrals (in the given form or in a transformed form) were investigated in other studies [3,22,26,27]. The results obtained using Programs 1 and 2 are displayed in Table 5.…”
Section: Numerical Results For Some Selected Integralsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Now we write (3)(4)(5)(6)(7) so that k(x) = e~xlK(x), k*(x) = e~x2K*(x), \k*-k\\p+)= \\K*-K\\p-\ It follows from the assumption (2.1) that K G Lp~\ Let us now require that K* be a polynomial. Since the polynomials are dense in the space L<p) (see [13, Lemma 2]), we can choose K* so that the first two terms on the right-hand side of (3.6) are each less than e, where e > 0 is a given arbitrary number.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A quite different method for handling oscillatory integrals over semi-infinite intervals is the acceleration method, which has been reviewed and extended by Blakemore, Evans and Hyslop [3]. That method is based on the use of accurate quadrature rules to integrate between successive zeros, combined with powerful acceleration techniques to speed the convergence as the upper limit is taken to infinity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%