AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum 2019
DOI: 10.2514/6.2019-3301
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Space Launch System Aerodynamic Surface Pressure Measurements from Experimental Testing and CFD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3 shows the SLS Block 1B crew vehicle model installed in the test section of the 11-Foot TWT with the model painted for PSP testing. The details of the PSP are presented in the paper by McMillin et al [10].…”
Section: B Model Installationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3 shows the SLS Block 1B crew vehicle model installed in the test section of the 11-Foot TWT with the model painted for PSP testing. The details of the PSP are presented in the paper by McMillin et al [10].…”
Section: B Model Installationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pressure-sensitive paint (PSP) is an optical method for quantifying static pressure spatially over an entire surface. The technique has enjoyed great success over recent years and has been applied successfully to full vehicles [1][2][3], rotating components [4][5][6], and even moving targets [7,8]. The study by Casper et al [9] demonstrated the use of polymer ceramic (PC) PSP to measure the blast response on a model in an 6 Instrumentation specialist, Spurpark Ltd. * Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%