Comparison of spatial and temporal interaction techniques for 3D audio trajectory authoring

Abstract

With the popularity of immersive media, developing usable tools for content development is important for the production process. In the context of 3D audio production, user interfaces for authoring and editing 3D audio trajectories enable content developers, composers, practitioners, and recording and mixing engineers to define how audio sources travel in time. However, common interaction techniques in 3D audio production tools can make the workflow of this task tedious and difficult to accomplish. This study investigates this problem by classifying the atomic tasks (spatially and temporally) of a general composite task of authoring 3D audio trajectories and then evaluating different interaction techniques across these tasks. Common graphical user interfaces were compared with input devices having varying degrees-of-freedom for spatial atomic tasks in order to investigate the effect of direct manipulation and integrality of interaction techniques. Continuous and discrete interaction techniques were compared for temporal tasks in order to investigate the effect of direct manipulation. Results suggest that interaction techniques with high degrees of integrality and direct manipulation reduce task completion time compared to standard GUI techniques. The design of temporal tasks can create a visual bias, and discrete-time controls can be a suitable method for traversing a small number of control points. These results and further observations provide directions on the study of interaction technique design for 3D audio tools, which in turn should improve workflows of 3D audio content creation.

VEPdgets: Towards Richer Interaction Elements Based on Visually Evoked Potentials

“…They used usual GUI interaction elements and temporal diagrams for the navigation and queries of video sequences. Another approach on temporal data by Mathew et al [41] used spatial and temporal interaction techniques for audio authoring. In their study, they investigated inputs such as physical sliders, touch interaction and a phantom 3D controller.…”

Sound quality of the Valli theatre: standard outcomes and development of data presentation

“…The employment of the em32 Eigenmike® microphone during the acoustic survey allowed the authors to analyze sound maps based on the 3 degree of freedom (3dof) [17]. These maps, herein introduced as a result of video screen shots, are useful to understand the role played by the architectural and construction elements interacting with the sound waves, showing the direction of arrival of the sound reflections and their relative sound intensity.…”

SABLIER : a Tangible Interactor to Navigate through Space and Time

“…On the other hand, spatial navigation is often seen in video games where the user has to move and find its way through a digital environment or in GPS application when planning a trip. With a 2D Graphical User Interface (GUI), the user handles controllers such as keyboard, mouse, or joystick to either move an avatar or interact with graphical elements [34]. In the case of 3D immersive interfaces, notably those presented in Virtual or Mixed Reality, other metaphors have appeared, such as pointing in a direction [8], grabbing the environment, walking while being tracked by the computer system [41] and, more recently, teleportation by pointing to the destination [9].…”