2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-2991(00)80069-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Specific Surface Areas of a Micronized Drug Substance as Determined by Different Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A six-station specific surface area analyzer was used to determine the specific surface area and pore size of activated carbon and zeolites (ASAP 2460, Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, USA) [32]. The zeta potential of the two adsorbents was determined using a zetapotential analyzer (ZS90, Malvern Instruments UK Ltd., Malvern, UK) with disposal folded capillary cells [33].…”
Section: Characterization Of Activated Carbon and Zeolitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A six-station specific surface area analyzer was used to determine the specific surface area and pore size of activated carbon and zeolites (ASAP 2460, Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, USA) [32]. The zeta potential of the two adsorbents was determined using a zetapotential analyzer (ZS90, Malvern Instruments UK Ltd., Malvern, UK) with disposal folded capillary cells [33].…”
Section: Characterization Of Activated Carbon and Zeolitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the dense and flat film, the nanofiber morphology greatly improves the rate of adsorption and desorption by increasing the effective contact volume with analyte molecules. Here, we introduce specific surface area (SSA) as a dimensionless parameter to explain the difference between flat and nanofibrous films [26,27].…”
Section: Simulation Model Of Finite Element Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%