2013
DOI: 10.3906/elk-1112-84
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of speech parameterization techniques for the classification of speech disfluencies

Abstract: The effect of the 2 parameters (LPC order and frame length) in the LPC-and PLP-based methods on the classification results is also investigated. The experimental results reveal that the proposed method can be used to help speech language pathologists in classifying speech disfluencies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2009, Ravikumar et al [24] attempted to improve their previous results [23] through the SVM with MFCC features. Yen Fook et al [10] presented a comparison of three feature extraction methods such as the MFCC, linear predictive coding (LPC) and perceptual linear predictive (PLP) analysis for the classification of repetition and prolongation dysfluencies. Three different classifiers (k-NN, LDA, and SVM) were employed and compared in the study.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In 2009, Ravikumar et al [24] attempted to improve their previous results [23] through the SVM with MFCC features. Yen Fook et al [10] presented a comparison of three feature extraction methods such as the MFCC, linear predictive coding (LPC) and perceptual linear predictive (PLP) analysis for the classification of repetition and prolongation dysfluencies. Three different classifiers (k-NN, LDA, and SVM) were employed and compared in the study.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past several years, considerable studies have been carried out on automatic detection and classification of stuttering dysfluencies [1-3, 10, 23, 24, 32, 34, 35]. Most of them focus on acoustic analysis, parametric and nonparametric feature extraction, and statistical approaches [10,24,32,34,35].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Formant description depends on order of filter p [22] , it is taken as 30 [28]. Low order cepstral coefficients are sensitive to the overall spectral slope and the high-order cepstral coefficients are sensitive to noise and other forms of noise like variability [25].…”
Section: B Mel-frequency Cepstral Coefficients (Mfcc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Mel scale can be converted from the frequency scale using (2) given below. Each overlapping mel filter can be viewed as a histogram bin in the frequency domain [25]. Each filter in the bank is multiplied by the spectrum so that only one single value of magnitude per filter is returned.…”
Section: B Mel-frequency Cepstral Coefficients (Mfcc)mentioning
confidence: 99%