2017
DOI: 10.1292/jvms.17-0012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of sperm subpopulation structures in first and second ejaculated semen from Japanese black bulls by a cluster analysis of sperm motility evaluated by a CASA system

Abstract: In the present study, bull sperm in the first and second ejaculates were divided into subpopulations based on their motility characteristics using a cluster analysis of data from computer-assisted sperm motility analysis (CASA). Semen samples were collected from 4 Japanese black bulls. Data from 9,228 motile sperm were classified into 4 clusters; 1) very rapid and progressively motile sperm, 2) rapid and circularly motile sperm with widely moving heads, 3) moderately motile sperm with heads moving frequently i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
13
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, sperm kinetic parameters other than VSL were affected by the frame rate. The number of bovine sperm incubated in BO for clustering in the present study (44,570 motile sperm) was markedly higher than in previous studies (16,,585 motile sperm) [24][25][26][27], and sperm in BO clearly exhibited hyperactivation-like characteristics; therefore, data on sperm captured at 150 fps were used as reference data for the discriminant analysis. The cluster analysis categorized motile sperm into 6 clusters in the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, sperm kinetic parameters other than VSL were affected by the frame rate. The number of bovine sperm incubated in BO for clustering in the present study (44,570 motile sperm) was markedly higher than in previous studies (16,,585 motile sperm) [24][25][26][27], and sperm in BO clearly exhibited hyperactivation-like characteristics; therefore, data on sperm captured at 150 fps were used as reference data for the discriminant analysis. The cluster analysis categorized motile sperm into 6 clusters in the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…Sperm motility was evaluated as described in a previous study [16]. Briefly, semen samples were introduced into a 20-µm-deep chamber (SC20-01-04-B, Leja, GN Nieuw-Vennep, Netherlands) preliminary warmed at 37°C on a hot plate (Kitazato Corporation, Shizuoka, Japan), and sperm motility was evaluated using a CASA system (SMAS, DITECT, Tokyo, Japan) based on the digitalized images obtained by a ×10 negative-phase contrast microscope (E200, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Sperm Motility and Sperm Motility Parameters By Casamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After this step, sperm cells were washed using Tyrode's medium containing lactate, pyruvate, and HEPES (TL-HEPES) and subsequently used for in vitro fertilization (IVF). At this point, progressive sperm motility was subjectively assessed by a computer-assisted semen analyzer (CASA) visual estimation as described by others 59 . In brief, samples of semen were deposited in a 20-µm-deep chamber (SC20-01-04-B, Leja, GN Nieuw-Vennep, Netherlands) which was pre-heated to 37 °C on a hot plate.…”
Section: Preparation Of Bovine Sperm and Determination Of Effective Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a well-grounded statistical model to determine the number of clusters (subpopulations) to be considered is not yet available for CASA data (Martínez-Pastor et al 2011). Most of these studies considered variations in the frequencies of determined motile subpopulations to assess differences among individual or repeated ejaculates (Vázquez et al 2015;Kanno et al 2017), possible fertility of ejaculates (Quintero-Moreno et al 2007;García-Á lvarez et al 2014) and the effect of short-term storage and cryopreservation on sperm quality (Martinez-Pastor et al 2005;Núñez-Martínez et al 2006;Dorado et al 2011).…”
Section: Motility Subpopulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%