2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2009.10.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of SRIM, MCNPX and GEANT simulations with experimental data for thick Al absorbers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare both the linear model and the exponential model with our experimental results for Al ions. In our study, we have used the Monte Carlo simulation code SRIM [30] to calculate the stopping powers of a BAS-TR IP for Al ions because SRIM is known to represent the available experimental data well [31,32]. We show that the response function calculations using stopping power from SRIM code agree very well with our experimental data for Al ions up to 222 MeV.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…We compare both the linear model and the exponential model with our experimental results for Al ions. In our study, we have used the Monte Carlo simulation code SRIM [30] to calculate the stopping powers of a BAS-TR IP for Al ions because SRIM is known to represent the available experimental data well [31,32]. We show that the response function calculations using stopping power from SRIM code agree very well with our experimental data for Al ions up to 222 MeV.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…虽然中子、质子辐照碳化硅发生 核反应时可能产生部分重离子, 但产生的都是中低 能重离子, 不足以体现更高能量的重离子在碳化硅 中的能量损失特性. 现有的研究表明碳化硅器件存 在严重的单粒子栅穿(single event gate rupture, SEGR)和单粒子烧毁(single event burnout, SEB) 问题, 且碳化硅MOSFET和二极管存在单粒子烧 毁阈值电压 [19−23] 列, 重离子在碳化硅中的射程分别使用SRIM软 件 [24] 和Geant4软件计算得到. 从表1可以看到, 使用Geant4软件的计算结果与SRIM的计算结 果有较好的一致性, 最大相差14.1%.…”
unclassified
“…In particular, we succeed to compare TRIM, MCNPX and GEANT4 simulations with the experimental spectra for a number of Al absorbers with various thicknesses for 19.68 MeV [7] and 49.1 MeV [8] protons passing through, for two Au targets and 49.1 MeV protons [9], and for polyethylene absorber and 25 MeV protons [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%