2018
DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia2018090115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of standard and fast track rehabilitation in patients with acute appendicitis. Intermediate results of multicenter prospective randomized trial

Abstract: Цель исследования-изучить результаты применения методов ускоренной реабилитации у пациентов с острым аппендицитом. Материал и методы. Проведено проспективное рандомизированное многоцентровое исследование среди 86 (38-основная группа и 48-контрольная) пациентов с лапароскопической аппендэктомией и лигатурным способом обработки культи червеобразного отростка под эндотрахеальным наркозом. Протокол включал: информирование, отказ от премедикации, инфузию глюкозы перед операцией, антибиотикопрофилактику, удаление бр… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The search strategy yielded 12 047 unique references, of which 1493 were reviewed in full-text, 495 were included in the overall systematic review (eFigure in Supplement 1) and 74 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The characteristics of each individual study are included in eTable 1 in Supplement 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The search strategy yielded 12 047 unique references, of which 1493 were reviewed in full-text, 495 were included in the overall systematic review (eFigure in Supplement 1) and 74 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The characteristics of each individual study are included in eTable 1 in Supplement 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The included studies represent 9076 patients with 4577 patients in the control (non-ERAS) group and 4375 patients in the ERAS group. In the 54 studies that included age, the mean (SD) age was 50.0 (12.6) years for patients in the control group and 49.2 (12.6) years among patients in the ERAS group …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations