2021
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2021.722569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Standard Caribbean Coral Reef Monitoring Protocols and Underwater Digital Photogrammetry to Characterize Hard Coral Species Composition, Abundance and Cover

Abstract: The precise assessing and monitoring of coral reefs are necessary to address and understand the threats and changes in coral communities. With the development of new technologies and algorithms for image processing, new protocols like underwater photogrammetry are implemented to study these ecosystems. This study compares the main ecological metrics for reef condition assessment, obtained with an underwater digital photogrammetry protocol (UWP) and traditional sampling design simulations in coral reefs of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study we compared commonly used ecosystem monitoring metrics on temperate rocky reefs dominated by urchin barrens between data extracted from high-resolution, SfM derived, photomosaics and traditional diver-based field quadrats. Primary survey metrics, including sea urchin densities, kelp canopy cover and benthic community composition data, were similar between the two methodologies, consistent with other papers comparing benthic data collected by photography with traditional methods (Dodge et al, 1982;Preskitt et al, 2004;Parravicini et al, 2009;Jokiel et al, 2015) and more specifically comparing the use of photomosaics with traditional methods (Ling, et al, 2016;Raoult et al, 2016;Burns et al, 2020;Barrera-Falcon et al, 2021;Couch et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In this study we compared commonly used ecosystem monitoring metrics on temperate rocky reefs dominated by urchin barrens between data extracted from high-resolution, SfM derived, photomosaics and traditional diver-based field quadrats. Primary survey metrics, including sea urchin densities, kelp canopy cover and benthic community composition data, were similar between the two methodologies, consistent with other papers comparing benthic data collected by photography with traditional methods (Dodge et al, 1982;Preskitt et al, 2004;Parravicini et al, 2009;Jokiel et al, 2015) and more specifically comparing the use of photomosaics with traditional methods (Ling, et al, 2016;Raoult et al, 2016;Burns et al, 2020;Barrera-Falcon et al, 2021;Couch et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…These contradictory results suggest that the difference is directly related to the sampling method used. It seems that there is an overestimation of the data when using traditional methods, in this case AGRRA as reported by Barrera-Falcon et al 2021 [42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Plot A was surveyed at ~1.8 m from the bottom using natural light, under the assumption that the downwelling light sensor (DLS) from the camera would compensate for the light variability during the imagery survey; this plot had large coral colonies, octocorals, and encompassed a deeper section in a sand channel between two spurs. The distance was selected following similar digital photogrammetry approaches [12,14,15,44].…”
Section: Field Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This optimal distance to the substrate of 0.5 m to collect useful data on at least four bands (B, G, R, RE) increases the time needed to survey that area as sweeps are narrower and data require very slow swimming to avoid image blurring. In comparison, other underwater digital photogrammetry approaches acquire pictures at distances ranging from 1 to 2 m above the bottom using camera lenses with similar or wider FOV (47.2 • for RedEdge-M vs. 42 • to 100 • for 55 to 18 mm lenses) [12,14,15,44], allowing the photographic survey of plots up to 100 m 2 in roughly the same time.…”
Section: Rededge-m Underwater Operational Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation